DAVID EASON AGAINST (FIRST) GEORGE BRUCE MILLER; (SECOND) DAVID JOHN HEWITSON; (THIRD) THOMAS JOHN BARROWMAN HILLIS; (FOURTH) DEIRDRE ELIZABETH MARY HART; (FIFTH) MARY NIMMO; (SIXTH) IRENE WALKER

---

 

OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION

[2016] CSOH 60

 

CA99/15

OPINION OF LORD DOHERTY

In the cause

(FIRST) MUNRO & NOBLE;  and (SECOND) MR GEORGE BRUCE MILLER;  MR DAVID JOHN HEWITSON;  MR THOMAS JOHN BARROWMAN HILLIS;  MRS DEIRDRE ELIZABETH MARY HART;  MRS MARY NIMMO and MR JOHN MACPHERSON

Pursuers;

against

MR DAVID EASON

Defender:

Pursuers:  Howie, QC;  Brodies LLP

Defender:  Davies;  Harper Macleod LLP

26 April 2016

[1]        The circumstances of the dispute between the parties is set out in the Opinion of today’s date in the related action, David Easson v George Bruce Miller & Ors [2016] CSOH59 , to which I refer.  In light of that Opinion, and as requested by the parties, I shall put both cases out by order for discussion of (i) the appropriate interlocutors to give effect to my decision; and (ii) further procedure in each case.