We use cookies to collect anonymous data to help us improve your site browsing experience.

Click 'Accept all cookies' to agree to all cookies that collect anonymous data. To only allow the cookies that make the site work, click 'Use essential cookies only.' Visit 'Set cookie preferences' to control specific cookies.

Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Search

What can we help you with today?

Skip to main

Case: HCA/2026/106/XC

Paul McCann v HM Advocate

Notice to viewers

References may be made to sexual offences, violence, or other sensitive matters. Some viewers may find the content distressing.

Where necessary, certain information may be restricted to protect the identity of complainers and witnesses.

Restrictions

Hearings are livestreamed as part of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service’s support for open justice.

Please note that recording, storing or broadcasting the proceedings is only possible if permitted under the law on fair dealing or if authorised by the Lord President under the Judicial Office for Scotland Broadcast Protocol.

Any unauthorised capture, re-use, re-editing or redistribution of the material could attract liability for breach of copyright, in addition to the possibility of contempt of court proceedings.

Watch previous livestream hearing

Paul McCann v HM Advocate

Case: HCA/2026/106/XC

Thursday, 08 October 2026

10:30 until conclusion

Welcome. Hearings are livestreamed as part of the SCTS's support of open justice.

This is an archive of a livestream. Find out about restrictions on livestreaming.

About this case

Case name

Paul McCann v HM Advocate

Case reference

HCA/2026/106/XC

Type of appeal

Appeal against Conviction

Date of hearing

Thursday 8 October 2026

Time of hearing

10:30 until conclusion

Judges

  • Lord Justice Clerk
  • Lord Matthews
  • Lord Clark

Counsel for the Appellant (PM)

Lorenzo Alonzi

Case description

[1]    The appellant was convicted after trial at the High Court of Justiciary at Livingston of three offences including a charge of attempted murder while in prison. On 20 February 2026, the trial judge sentenced the appellant to a period of 12 years’ imprisonment.

[2]    The appellant appeals against conviction on grounds that a Victim Impact Statement (“VIS”) given by the complainer on the charge of attempted murder was not disclosed by the Crown to the defence in advance of trial. It is argued that the terms of the VIS were favourable to the appellant.

[3]     The Crown concedes that the VIS ought to have been disclosed. The appellant maintains that had he received disclosure of the VIS in advance, he would have called the complainer as a witness to either: (i) give an account consistent with the appellant’s defence of self-defence; or (ii) be challenged about the terms of the VIS. He argues that his inability to do so resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

[4]    The High Court of Justiciary Appeal Court will hear the appeal against conviction on Thursday 8 October 2026 at 10:30am.