-
; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent : _____________ Complainer: Gilfedder, Solicitor Advocate; Paterson Bell Ltd, Edinburgh for FFM Solicitors, Glasgow Respondent, as Ecstasy at the Arches Nightclub in Glasgow on 23 December 2013 with intent to supply it to another
-
AGAINST CONVICTION by MIRZA BAIG Appellant ; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent : Appellant: C M Mitchell; John Pryde & Co, Edinburgh (for Bready & Company, Glasgow) Respondent, (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995. A trial took place in Glasgow Sheriff Court. At the close, January 2014, they were on duty on Northland Drive, Glasgow. The appellant’s vehicle was parked, to the individual complainer, who might be, for example, an intrepid Glasgow police officer. [21
-
by (FIRST) BARRY RODDEN AND (SECOND) PAUL RODDEN Appellants; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW, of the sheriff at Glasgow on 13 March 2011 to repel the appellants' pleas to the competency of the complaint, possible after a sale. She also relied upon the opinion of the court in PF, Glasgow v Jackson [2010, recognised that the statutory provision being addressed in PF, Glasgow v Jackson (section 172, . That is consistent with the opinion of the court in PF Glasgow v Jackson and with McLennan v
-
WILLIAM SCOTT HAMILTON Appellant; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, Glasgow Respondent, at Glasgow on summary complaint. The complaint contained a number of charges. One of these was a charge, in Gartocher Terrace, Springboig, Glasgow, each did conduct himself "in a disorderly manner, block said, Appellant; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, Glasgow Respondent: _______ Appellant: Wheatley, Appellant; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, Glasgow Respondent: _______ Appellant: Wheatley
-
by L W Appellant; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent, trial at the Justice of the Peace Court in Glasgow of a contravention of the Road Vehicles, nursing jobs available within the Glasgow area. [6] The appellant also gave evidence about, in that respect. The cases upon which reliance was placed included Muguraneza v P F Glasgow
-
in BILL OF SUSPENSION by MICHAEL STEWART Complainer ; against THE PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW, , Glasgow Respondent: Erroch, AD; Crown Agent 17 February 2015 [1] In terms of section 23(3, to determine any issues of disputed fact; see eg Evans and Kerr v PF Glasgow, Appeals no XJ767/12, Office and under secondment to SCDEA, called at my home at [an address in Glasgow] and indicated
-
, Glasgow Respondent: _______ Complainers: Jones, Q.C.; Allan McDougall Respondent: Menzies, granted on 5 November 1998 at the instance of the respondent by the sheriff of Glasgow, the Electoral Registration Officer for the City of Glasgow to add the names of persons, )on 19 May 1997 at a place in Glasgow presently unknown to the prosecutor you MUMTAZ HUSSAIN did
-
Sheriff C.A.L. Scott CA458/05 PARK LANE DEVELOPMENTS (GLASGOW HARBOUR) LIMITED v JEFFREY JESNER GLASGOW, 3 May 2006. The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, sustains the defender's first plea-in-law and dismisses the action; finds the pursuers liable to the defender in the expenses of the action; allows an account thereof to be given in and remits same, when lodged, for the purchase by the defender of a flat known as Flat 1/4, 302 Meadowside Quay Walk, Glasgow
-
against
PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW
Respondent
Appellant: Keenan (sol adv); Capital Defence Lawyes (for Graham Walker, Glasgow)
Respondent: Lord Advocate (Wolffe QC), K O’Mahony AD; the Crown Agent
4, , Aberdeen [2018] HCJAC 50.
[2] On 6 April 2018, at a trial diet in Glasgow Sheriff Court
-
the Sheriffdom of Glasgow and Strathkelvin at Glasgow in the cause WILLIAM HILL (CALEDONIAN) LIMITED Pursuers and Respondents; against CITY OF GLASGOW LICENSING BOARD First Defenders and Appellants, of Glasgow Council (First Defenders and Appellants) 25 February 2003 [1]On 27 October 2000 the City of Glasgow Licensing Board (hereinafter referred to as "the board") refused an application, office licence in respect of premises at 183A Baillieston Road, Glasgow. The applicants appealed