SCTSPRINT3

Judgment Search

110 search results for The Named Person Service

  1. he accepted that he was the person named in the warrant but that he did not consent to extradition, ] As is familiar, where a request is made for the extradition of a requested person to a category 2 territory, such as the United States of America, whether that person’s extradition is ordered will depend, issue a warrant for the arrest of the requested person if he has reasonable grounds to believe the matters set out in section 71(2). If a requested person has been arrested under a warrant issued under
  2. the occurrence of the fire on 31 January 2004, and the consequent death and injury of named residents, have developed, it is necessary to note certain events that preceded the service of the present, ; that the firm was a separate legal person from the partners; and that accordingly the petitioners were, , the petitioners' contention is that the firm was a legal person which ceased to exist when it, the firm-name." [18] Section 4(2) provides: "In Scotland a firm is a legal person distinct from
  3. . Telephone calls were being monitored, including calls to a person known as "Alf" in Spain and from, of confession or admissions by a person suspected or charged with crime. That principle would obviously
  4. an accused person and having been granted bail on 18 February 2009 at Glasgow Sheriff Court in terms, , community service reports and reports as to the possibility of a restriction of liberty order. On 2 March, service assessment were favourable and it appeared that the appellant deeply regretted his, (Scotland) Act 1995, provides that it is not competent to impose imprisonment on a person under the age of 21. However, section 207(2) enables a court to impose detention upon a person aged between 16
  5. been named as apprentice of the year. He had never been in trouble with the police. He lived, said: "We've just done a turn for money". They telephoned for the emergency services. In the meantime, of justice in respect that: "1. Brief Synopsis of Facts 1.1 The Appellant (the first named panel) and his co-accused (the second named panel) formed a common criminal purpose to assault and rob, the killing of a person. So it is the blameworthy killing of a person and that of course is a serious crime
  6. that he had not been the last person with the deceased, the individual named Mark had been, description was attached to the respondent, who was drunk enough to be refused service in a public house, him that he had been with the deceased that night. McDougall said that, as the last person seen with the deceased, he should go to the police. The respondent said he was not the last person, because a man named Mark had approached them, greeted him by name and started speaking to them. He did
  7. wife’s adultery, his belief that a named individual was her paramour, and other messages which, by counsel, is not per se prejudicial to an accused person's interests. In a case of this kind, this advice in person. [19] In his Anderson response, Mr Pollock indicated as follows: “I, or offer Solicitor Advocate services. The recommendation to the firm was based upon their prior, been the belief of those instructed that a recommendation had been made by Mr Pollock in person
  8. to DI Chisholm about the provenance of the box of bullets but eventually named his supplier as James, an individual as resembling the person she had seen in Papdale Woods. Her mother, who was also present, been the person in Papdale Woods on 19 May. [12] As soon as he made that admission, the interview, to or relied on this observation - that the appellant, before being interviewed, "declined the services, into the murder. No prosecution at that time was instituted against the appellant or any other person
  9. witness. According to the trial judge, she appeared to be a person of limited education and below, that KM had serious psychiatric problems for which she had received support from the psychiatric services, to the jury that she was a person with serious psychological problems, at least while in court, by a gardener at Quarrier's Homes named David. She said that after she returned to Cottage 5 and went, solicitors that there was no record of there having been a gardener named David at the relevant time
  10. Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) relating to disclosure of material in all High Court, hitherto unidentified DNA samples from the crime scene to a named individual. On 16 February police, fiscal at an early stage of relevant material to representatives of any person accused of crime

Right-hand Menu