SCTSPRINT3

Judgment Search

1084 search results for glasgow

  1. APPEAL COURT, HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY Lord Sutherland Lord Milligan Lady Cosgrove 615/98 OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by THE HONOURABLE LORD SUTHERLAND in STATED CASE by BERNARD GEORGE ELLIOTT Appellant against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent _____________ Appellant: A.L. Brown; Balfour & Manson Respondent: J.R. Docherty, Q.C.; Crown Agent 12 May 1999 This is the appeal of Bernard George Elliott, who was convicted of a charge
  2. APPEAL COURT, HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY Lord Sutherland Lord Milligan Lord Cowie 498/98 OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by THE HONOURABLE LORD SUTHERLAND in STATED CASE by JOHN MITCHELL Appellant against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent _____________ Appellant, Brown, Balfour & Manson Respondent, Cathcart, A.D. 11 May 1999 This is the appeal by John Mitchell who was convicted on two charges of contravening section 4(3
  3. , GLASGOW Respondent: _______ Complainer: Paterson, Solicitor Advocate; Paterson Bell, Edinburgh, the complainer is seeking to suspend a warrant granted by the sheriff at Glasgow on 10 November 2011, 2011 the complainer appeared at Glasgow Sheriff Court on a petition containing a charge, September 2011, the complainer again appeared at Glasgow Sheriff Court and was fully committed for trial
  4. APPEAL COURT, HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY Lord Prosser Lord Kingarth Lord Allanbridge Appeal No: 2201/99 OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LORD PROSSER in BILL OF SUSPENSION for CRAIG FITZGERALD Complainer; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, Glasgow Respondent: _______ Complainer: Shead; Drummond Miller Respondent: Bell, Q.C., A.D.; Crown Agent 16 February 2000 By this Bill, the complainer seeks suspension simpliciter of his convictions on the first two charges
  5. PAUL PATRICK THOMAS MONTAGUE Appellant; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, Glasgow Respondent, The appellant was convicted of a contravention of section 2(1) of the City of Glasgow District, towards an area to the rear of the Pollock Leisure Pool, Cowglen Road, Glasgow. On arrival there they saw, ". Schedule 1 is in the following terms: "All of the public areas within the City of Glasgow bounded by the designated boundary of the City of Glasgow District as defined in the Local Government
  6. 23/99 Lord Justice General Lord Sutherland Lord Coulsfield HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by THE LORD JUSTICE GENERAL in PETITION TO THE NOBILE OFFICIUM by MARK ANTHONY POTTER, Petitioner against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW, Respondent _____________ Petitioner: Muir Respondent: Bell, Q.C. A.D. 18 February 1999 The petitioner is Mark Anthony Potter who appeared in Glasgow Sheriff Court on a summary complaint alleging assault
  7. Complainers; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent: _______ First Complainer, in the Sheriff Court in Glasgow on a long and detailed charge of fraud. At the first diet on 10 May 2011, . The search was carried out in terms of a warrant granted by the Sheriff at Glasgow on 4 August 2008, by the sheriff clerk at Glasgow in relation to estates of the late Joni McPherson-Smith and Bessie Laver, within the Sheriffdom of Glasgow and Strathkelvin and that the Sheriff thus had jurisdiction to grant
  8. APPEAL COURT, HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY Lady Paton Lord Drummond Young Sheriff Principal Lockhart [2014] HCJAC81 HCA/2014/002341/XJ OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LADY PATON in APPEAL BY STATED CASE by GRAHAM DUFFY Appellant ; against PROCURATOR FISCAL GLASGOW Respondent : _____________ Appellant, stone bench in Royal Exchange Square Glasgow. Their movements were captured by a CCTV camera
  9. APPEAL COURT, HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY Lord Prosser Lord Kingarth Lord Eassie Appeal No: 1329/00 OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LORD PROSSER in STATED CASE by KENNETH LESLIE STEWART KINNAIRD Appellant against PROCURATOR FISCAL GLASGOW Respondent _____________ Appellant: L.H.S. Macneill, A.D.; Crown Agent Respondent: M. Scott; Drummond Miller, by the stipendiary magistrate at Glasgow on 29 March of a charge under Section 41 of the Police
  10. ; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW Respondent: _____________ Complainer Glancy: S Collins, at Glasgow dated 7 February 2013. On that date each of the complainers was present at Glasgow Sheriff, . The bills are opposed by the respondent. [2] Each of the complainers was charged in Glasgow

Right-hand Menu