-
. That Form states, among other things - "The above-named convicted person appeals against, be a quorum of the High Court. ... ...". Section 106 (right of appeal) provides: "(1) Any person, ) against any probation order, drug treatment and testing order or any community service order; (da, against any sentence fixed by law. (3) By an appeal under subsection (1) above a person may bring, , the convicted person may lodge a written note of appeal with the Clerk of Justiciary ... ... (3) A note
-
, an accused person shall not be tried on indictment for any offence unless the trial is commenced, , to support the view that where the 12 month period had already expired before the service of a High, limits where they have elapsed before service of an indictment . There may , I suppose, 1971, all of them involving the supplying of controlled drugs to named individuals. The matter, to, were the supplying of controlled drugs to five named individuals. He said he was not told
-
alia as follows: "(1) Any person convicted on indictment may, with leave granted in accordance, - (a) against such conviction; ... ..... (3) By an appeal under subsection (1) above a person may, such as is mentioned in paragraph (a) of subsection (3) above is evidence - (a) which is - (i) from a person, as to why the evidence now sought to be adduced was not given by that person at those proceedings, which, ; (b) is from a source independent of the person referred to in subsection (3C) above; and (c
-
McGarrigle is named in a notice of incrimination lodged on behalf of the accused. McGarrigle previously, as a hearing to dispose of the minute. I ordered service of the minute upon the Lord Advocate, into account the frankness and honesty of the person who had made the statements in question, told by another person about material events. I was not asked to make any ruling about that matter, was accompanied by Haq and another man named Cassidy. Evidence about what happened next came from one
-
to identify children. There required to be a doctor or other trained medical person to say whether a person was of a particular age. This stance was modified to an acceptance that it would have been sufficient if the witness had been trained in what to look for in a person’s development to determine, on 10 September; the owner being named as the appellant and the Adobe and Google accounts related, for excluding the evidence. A wide range of evidence types were available to demonstrate that a person
-
1997. At that adjourned diet Lieuwe Hoekstra, the first-named appellant, and Jan Van Rijs, the second-named appellant, were each sentenced to 14 years' imprisonment, backdated to 29 July 1996. Ronny Van Rijs, the third-named appellant, and Hendrik Van Rijs, the fourth-named appellant, were each, the appellants, not being satisfied with the advice and services of those then representing them, ceased to be represented by them. They eventually engaged the services of other lawyers
-
Appellant: A Brown, QC, Considine, Sol Adv; Faculty Services Limited
Respondent: M Meehan, AD, another person to commit that crime. Applying the reasoning of the trial judge in the present case, not to identify a particular person could constitute the crime. As in the case of Scott already referred, knew that the witness Agnes Brown had named him in a statement to the police, implicating him
-
] In the CCTV images, one person, wearing light coloured clothes, can be seen walking away from, identified the appellant in court, and named the other two attackers, as being the three assailants, white clothing and had a particular gait, which could be seen in the images of the person walking away, on a warrant only on 19 January 2010, had given evidence. He had denied being the person shown in the CCTV, within two weeks of the final determination of the case, a convicted person has eight weeks
-
that the person or persons who were responsible for the deliberate introduction of the explosive device, that the person to ask about it would be the author of the memorandum, Mr Feraday, but this was not done, , but these were fruitless. In about June 1990 CI Williamson received information from an FBI officer named, was at the build-up area. To achieve that, the person placing the suitcase would have had to avoid being detected, but the evidence indicates that a person in possession of a pass for the airside area would
-
of a Juror. Said Juror, who is named in the Affidavits hereinafter referred to was a friend of one, say "We've got the person now". This was said on the same night in 1997. The witness said he was going, court person came in and said "Billy Lanigan" and she saw him. His Dad was there with him and he, was BILLY LANIGAN (21). He explained that he was called to give jury service at the time of the trial, . Joseph had left the unit shortly after he (the witness) was called for jury service. He was told