SCTSPRINT3

Judgment Search

836 search results for 7 march

  1. Solicitors EDINBURGH, 13 March 2019 The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause; (i) sustains, 7, between lines 30 and 35, the sentence commencing with the words “Explained and averred, of consideration and solvency [7] Ms Ower submitted that no specific and relevant defence to the action had, in paragraphs 3, 5, 6 and 7 of the pursuer’s note on the basis of preliminary plea. In so far, were directed towards the averments in answer 4, at p 7, lines 30-35, which appeared to invoke
  2. , (1869) 8 M. 157; 7. Fernie v. Robertson, (1871) 9 M. 437; 8. Watson v. Shankland, (1871) 10 M, ; (2007) 64. Stair, Institutions, I, 7, 7 (1693) 65. Trayner's Latin Maxims, (4th edtn.) pp. 377, company as narrated in para [5]. [7] The Defenders departed from their first plea-in-law regarding, else to carry our work which could have been done by the Pursuers. 7. Paragraph 2.3.4 of the Note, that they would obtain benefit for the work undertaken." Page 11 of the Record narrates that in March 2006
  3. of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. 6. The child has resided in foster care since 2 June 2009. 7. The first, Register. The children's names were removed from the Child Protection Register on 7 December 1994, /Action Plan attached to the Social Work Report dated 07/01/2010. 64. On 16 March 2010, a meeting, the child's development. 65. On 29th March 2010 the Agency Decision Maker endorsed the recommendation of the Fostering and Adoption Panel of 16th March 2010. 66. The respondents were married
  4. named defender) FORFAR, 7 January 2013 The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, February and to be completed by 3 March 2009. The pursuer himself partially demolished the affected, the southern end, AC carried out that work on the authority of said Notice around 10 March 2009, 3 to 7 December 2012 when the proof concluded. I heard from the following witnesses called, to commence by 10 February 2009 and be completed by 3 March 2009. The notice advised him inter alia
  5. were reported to the Procurator Fiscal for a contravention of section 28 A (7) of the Firearms Act, whilst being stored on the said wardrobe. 7. Whilst the pursuer and CD were living in the address, the Chief Officer of Police by whom the certificate was granted within 7 days of the theft, loss, 28A(7) of the 1968 Act. The PF did not raise proceedings in respect of this report. 27, for the pursuer; dismisses both appeals; and fixes a procedural hearing on 6 March at 2pm within
  6. of the averments as I have recorded in my interlocutor. (3) I heard the appeal on 3 February and 19 March, . Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm (2008) 3 WLR 194 On 19 March I heard further submissions, Dunbartonshire Council with regard to L's additional support needs in terms of Section 7, as at 6 October, 2008. (7) In addition, although the Sheriff's judgement at first instance refers, of a person is justified if it is the result of a permitted form of selection. (7) Otherwise, less
  7. Edinburgh, 15 March, 2017 The sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, makes the following, of their childhood. 7. Meanwhile, it is in the children’s interests that there be regular, of their daughters once a year. [7] At the proof, evidence was given by Y, foster carer, Stuart
  8. March 1968. She has not been employed since she had her daughter in or about 1996: before, approximately half a wheel behind. Mr Sandison followed in his car at some distance behind. [7, for his injured wife from oncoming traffic. [7] The defender, Mr Shorthouse and Mr
  9. ). The appellant was called to appear before the respondent’s committee on 31 March 2015. At that hearing, of a licence. There is a right of appeal but in terms of paragraph 18(7) the sheriff may uphold, should be remitted for reconsideration. [7] The appeal is presented on a mixture of the first
  10. for the child. (7) Where the local authority that made the application under subsection (2, . Suffice to say he is an extremely vulnerable child with complicated needs. [7] The child, placement in the residential unit and related schooling cost are considerable. As at March 2014

Right-hand Menu