-
the appeal and adheres to the interlocutors of the sheriff dated 19 February and 28 March 2007; finds, on the part of the defender. Accordingly, I have granted decree of absolvitor. [7] At the hearing
-
). [7] At the peremptory diet on 4th June 2008 there was no appearance by or on behalf of the defender, of March and April this year he had been working away from home in Inverness. He had received the letter
-
of dated 14 March 2002; remits the cause to the sheriff to proceed as accords; continues the cause, consumer; the contract was for the purpose of satisfying his own needs - he was not "trading on". [7
-
(754/04) JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL EDWARD F BOWEN QC in the appeal in the cause MRS CATHERINE BLACK Pursuer and Appellant against FRASER McGREGOR Defender and Respondent Act: Carlin, Solicitor, Friels Alt: Brown, Advocate, instructed by McClure Naismith glasgow, 13 MARCH 2006 The Sheriff Principal, having resumed consideration of the cause, sustains the appeal; recalls, specific provisions for the running of interest in a situation where the contract was rescinded. 7
-
(2 March 2017) been amended to a limit of 555 taxi licences. 7. The appellant sought a statement, of section 20 of the Equality Act 2010. THEREFORE: Upholds the appeal in terms of sub-paragraph 7, would not be fair to the appellant in the circumstances. [7] The penultimate paragraph, conduct that would otherwise be prohibited by or under this Act. (7) The relevant protected, consider that the respondent fulfilled one of the criteria in sub-paragraph 7 of paragraph 18
-
as joint tenants until around 7 December 2015, together with their children. Between 25 November 2011, by the pursuer with a registered tenancy deposit scheme. Between 25 November 2013 and 7 December, at 23 Donald’s Court, Dundee DD2 2TN between 25 November 2011 and 7 December 2015. The pursuer, the terms of the various clauses which I have set out above. [7] Clause 6 relates to the payment, . Taking a 15% annual deduction would assume a more realistic 6 to 7 year lifespan. On this basis
-
first came before my colleague at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on 7 January 2009. At that time Mr. Roy, within the 10-day limit set down in section 47(3) of the Act. The Hearing [7] By contrast, on 7 January 2009. Since she had been on remand in prison she had only seen Layla at two short visits, on Ullah and Launder v UK. The existence of Art 4(7)(a) of the Framework Decision , recognising, of Request proceedings took place at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on 26 March 2008 when the Accused and Mr
-
of America on 7 February 1997. 5/3/2 is their marriage license. [3] Their only son L was born, together in Athens and later in Preble County, Ohio. [7] In about June 2001, the defender told, with the defender; (7) That it is better that the specific issue order and an order for ongoing contact, himself and to ascertain his views. [3] Submissions were called for in writing within 7 days after, or not to make such an order and what order to make, the court is required by section 11(7) to do
-
March 2002. At that time, one or more of the steel plates condescended upon by the pursuer had become, and instructed by the third party attended at the service yard in March 2002. At that time they attended, employees or those under the third party’s instruction and control.” [7] The defender, . [37] The defender avers that the third party carried out an excavation in or around March, and instructed by the third party attended at the service yard in March 2002. At that time they attended
-
has had. The oldest is KD born, 7th August 1985 and the middle child is KYD, born 7th March 1984, to assist HD. (7) In the first few months of her life, L returned to hospital on three occasions due, ) In April 2006, Olwyn Soulsby was allocated as a social worker to L. In about March 2006, there had, of the upbringing afforded by HD to two prior children. [7] Mrs Soulsby, unlike her superiors