-
hours each week. (7) The pursuer has not sexually abused his daughter. (8) The pursuer has, for private parts in Spanish). [7] In her statement to the police on 2 October 2008, in March 2007. According to the defender, Z had had the problem before that. The problem, adjournment on 15 March, because the reports of the computer expert and translator for the defender were, March 2007 to June 2008, according to the defender. There was also a reference made to the note
-
. The consequence was that a devolution minute was subsequently lodged on 8th March 2012. It raised the issue, bringing these payments into line with the financial limit of £550. [7] Miss Law informed me
-
CA324/04 SHERIFF C A L SCOTT, Advocate STRATTON (TRADE SALES) LTD v MCS (SCOTLAND) LTD GLASGOW, 24 March, 2005. The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, allows the record to be amended in terms of the pursuers' minute of amendment no. 11 of process; thereafter, sustains the defenders' second plea-in-law to the extent of excluding from probation the pursuers' averments, and, in particular, sub-sections (1), (2) and (7). Furthermore, in terms of section 2 of the Act
-
by the Public Guardian (Nos. 5/1/1 and 5/1/2 of process). [2] The Adult was born on 5 March 1929, , powers and functions that come with being so appointed. [7] C is a specialist psychiatrist. He
-
SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW A91/10 JUDGMENT of SHERIFF PRINCIPAL C A L SCOTT, QC in the cause Gordon Collins Pursuer against Carol Anne Sweeney Defender Glasgow, 13 March 2014. The sheriff principal, having resumed consideration of the appeal, Refuses same and Adheres to the sheriff's interlocutor dated 21 February 2013; Finds the defender liable, of division of the property." [7] Counsel for the defender drew the court's attention to the terms
-
SHERIFFDOM OF TAYSIDE CENTRAL AND FIFE AT DUNDEE A812/03 JUDGEMENT OF SHERIFF FRANK R CROWE i.c. ANGUS HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITEDPURSUER against GILLIAN FRASERDEFENDER Act: Drysdale, Miller Hendry, Solicitors, Dundee Alt: J McDonald, Dundee North Law Centre DUNDEE, MARCH 2004 The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, finds the following facts admitted or proved, a response or a visit from the Defender. After Mrs McLeod sent the Defender letters on 31 January and 7
-
LINLITHGOW A403/02 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL IAIN MACPHAIL QC in the appeal in the cause ELIZABETH ANNE WEIR or KIRK Pursuer and Respondent against ROBERT KIRK Defender and Appellant _________________________ Act: Cockburn; Cockburn McGrane Alt: Travers; Russel & Aitken, Falkirk EDINBURGH, 14 March 2003 The Sheriff Principal, having resumed consideration of the cause, that the interlocutor of 25 August 1993 was incompetent in this respect.' [7]In the absence of detailed argument
-
A3898/03 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL EDWARD F BOWEN QC in the cause ALEXANDER MALEY PURSUERS against SCOTTISH MINISTERS DEFENDER Act: Kelly, Solicitor, Taylor & Kelly, Coatbridge. Alt: Miss Poole, Advocate, instructed by The Solicitor to the Scottish Executive. GLASGOW, 31 March 2004. The Sheriff Principal having resumed consideration of the cause, refuses the appeal, by the conditions complained of. [7]The solicitor for the pursuer and appellant proceeded to identify three
-
DAVID J C MACROBERT v JAMES WILLIAM CAHILL - A2680/94 GLASGOW, 2 March 2005. The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, FINDS-IN-FACT THAT: (1)Thomas Peter Cahill died on 31 July 1986. At the time of his death, he was survived by four children, namely, Mrs Marie Therese Keilty, Miss Margaret Bernadette Cahill, Dr Catherine Smith and the defender. (2)The heritable subjects, factor should be appointed. (7)By interlocutor of the Court of Session dated 20 January 1989
-
SHERIFFDOM OF TAYSIDE, CENTRAL AND FIFE AT DUNDEE Case No. A212/12 JUDGEMENT of SHERIFF K.J. McGOWAN in the cause DIANE GIBSON Pursuer against (FIRST) MRS SANDRA GOW AND (SECOND) MR DEREK GOW Defender __________________ Dundee, 26 March 2014 The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, (i) finds the pursuer liable to the defender, to the actual terms of the proposed amendment. [7] In order to save time, I allowed the amendment