-
. The pursuer claims that this happened in April 2013, and in March 2014 the pursuer raised an action against, ; and 3. To find no expenses due to or by either party.” [7] The interlocutor which
-
was not made and remains unpaid. This is admitted. [7] On 19 January 2016, the pursuer's, ] On 16 March 2016 the pursuer initiated a formal calling up process in terms of sections 19 and 20
-
SHERIFFDOM OF LOTHIAN AND BORDERS AT EDINBURGH [2016] SC EDIN 30 SA1139/15 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF KENNETH J McGOWAN In the cause CHARLOTTE WAELDE Pursuer; Against FELIX ULLOA Defender: Edinburgh, 29 March 2016 The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, grants decree against the defender for payment to the pursuer of £100.00; finds no expenses due, party. [7] In about 2014, some problems with the roof of the building developed
-
(Scotland) Regulations 2011 came into effect on 6th March 2011. Landlords, from then on, were, be retained at the end of the tenancy, with reference to the terms of the tenancy agreement.” [7
-
. Since 15 March 2008 the child has lived in family with his father along with the petitioner, of his birth mother’s position.”: Report dated 24 July 2014, para (s). [7] The weight
-
or retention is not in contravention of a court order. Sequence of events [7]The children, period on 24 November 2011, 8 March 2012, 19 July 2012, without jurisdictional objection by the defender
-
was issued on 17th March 2005 with further requests for payment on 21st April, 5th May and 12th May, . The first was Marie Reilly, an Office Manager in the pursuer's Finance Department. [7] Marie
-
have already been provided with a copy of Brown Homes latest accounts for the year ended 31 March, that the respondents meet the expenses incurred to date". 7. The Sheriff then dealt
-
in section 204. Mrs Grant produced a letter from the liquidator dated 17th March 2010 stating, Properties. 7. I start by setting out the relevant parts of section 204. The head note to section 204
-
SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW F1404/12 JUDGMENT of SHERIFF PRINCIPAL C A L SCOTT, QC in the cause Kelly Rodger or Findlay Pursuer against Alasdair Russell Findlay Defender Glasgow, 14 March 2014. The sheriff principal, having resumed consideration of the appeal, Allows same and that to the extent of recalling the sheriff's interlocutor dated 12 July 2013, for the payment of a capital sum.) [7] It was stressed on behalf of the pursuer that the only principle invoked