-
". In the case of the first named complainer the order in question was imposed by the Sheriff at Stirling on 29 February 2012 and in the case of the second named complainer the Sheriff at Stirling imposed, in such orders replacing probation, community service and supervised attendance orders. It appears, or another person determined by the responsible officer, at such time and place as may be determined
-
not be competent for any person appearing to answer a complaint, or for counsel or a solicitor appearing, of the respondent that there was no service of the complaint upon the appellant and that he was not cited, confirmed in correspondence with the respondent that there had been no service or citation, on behalf of the above named accused and hereby intimate that our client pleads not guilty, incompetent because the complaint had not been served. The service of the second complaint did not cure
-
to be a statement taken from [a named person] and signed by her … [S] have indicated, warranted for service. Having heard Mr Smith on behalf of the complainers, I adjourned in order to allow, warrant ad interim, granted warrant for service of the bill and continued the matter to a date, at the instance of the respondent in these terms: “to any Constable of Police Service of Scotland, hand, I would expect the respondent, as a representative of the Crown, which in the person
-
such help as that would mean admitting to another person that he had a problem viewing images of this type, of folders and subfolders, some of which were named to indicate the content, such as "4YO, that the delay was caused because he was told by Stop it Now!'s helpline that the nearest service that he could obtain was in Sheffield and that no services available in Scotland. Stop it Now, not engage well with social services. The appellant's solicitor further acknowledged that, given
-
as follows: "Where a person is convicted by the sheriff of - (b)a second or subsequent offence, for the accused person his right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human, violence, because no violence was averred to have been perpetrated on the person of a complainer, , and the libel included an averment that the accused had threatened to assault a named complainer, personal violence even if no actual violence was done to the person of a complainer. He referred
-
the country. That had become known to the Crown before the service of the indictment on McKay, . Duffy was convicted on a charge that he had conspired with another, named as Robert Miller, to set fire to a house in Cumbernauld "and to murder the [named] occupants thereof namely...and in furtherance, to be quite unjustifiable for this Court to applaud or countenance the subsequent service of an indictment upon McAuley for having engaged in a fraudulent scheme with a person who after, I must presume
-
and by a witness named Scott Bay. In addition, the evidence of two police witnesses was tendered, and went to investigate. He and the three friends went round the corner and found a friend named, the emergency services or to drive Alan to hospital; and in that situation the appellant had done what, to use it in order to summon the emergency services. In our opinion the foregoing circumstances go, all that has happened is that a person has moved a vehicle for a distance of a few yards in order
-
: Stewart, QC, Toner; Faculty Services Limited Respondent: J Farquharson, AD; Crown Agent 22 March, ] Guest refuses to name the person whom he alleges set matters in train. He fears reprisals against, was intended to make life difficult for various named persons who were suspected of being involved in criminal activity. The appellant was not initially a target of the operation. He became a person of interest after being seen to associate with some of the named targets. [8] PC Farr and his
-
a number of individuals in an operation code-named Autumn Leaves. In particular they raided premises, Service. His instructions from them were that any bomb he made must not be primed. Moreover, while, … that the MST-13 timers were not supplied by the Libyan intelligence services to any other party or that only the Libyan intelligence services were in possession of the timers”. No further inquiries had, the inference that the MST-13 timers had been supplied by the Libyan intelligence services
-
, that the person who made the statement - "is named and otherwise sufficiently identified, but cannot, a community service order of 300 hours and ordered the appellant to pay £4,000 by way of compensation, recognised the appellant as a person whom he knew from the same public house. He had spoken briefly, timeously lodged special defences of alibi and of incrimination. One of the persons named as an incriminee