-
CA405/05 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL JAMES A TAYLOR in the cause John Morrish RESPONDENT against NTL Group Limited APPELLANTS GLASGOW, 14 June 2006. The Sheriff Principal, having resumed consideration of the cause, Refuses the appeal; Remits the case to the sheriff to proceed as accords; Finds the appellant liable to the respondent in the expenses of the appeal as these might, in his submission. Mr Reid also referred to Morran v Glasgow Council of Tenants Associations 1997 SC
-
, Glasgow on the instructions of a Mrs Anne Campbell, the first defender in this action. The pursuers, out by Lord Kincraig in Libertas-Kommerz Gmbh. GLASGOW December 2007
-
B240/11 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL C A L SCOTT in the cause JG APPELLANT against Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland RESPONDENTS GLASGOW, 17 June 2011. The sheriff principal, having resumed consideration of the cause, Refuses the appeal; Finds the appellant, as an assisted person, liable to the respondents in the expenses of the appeal procedure as these might be taxed, of the respondents taken at Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow on 20 December 2010 should be set aside. That decision
-
The City of Glasgow Licensing Board [1999] 13 SLLP 12; Hamid v The City of Glasgow Licensing Board [2001] 18 SLLP 8; Salem & Javed v The City of Glasgow Licensing Board (Sh Baird unreported April 2009, to the recent decision of Sheriff J K Mitchell in Glasgow Lidl (UK) Gmb H v City of Glasgow Licensing Board, Mitchell in the case of Lidl UK GmbH v City of Glasgow Licensing Board (4 November 2011 unreported
-
that it was unreasonable. I was also referred to the case of Christoforou v City of Glasgow District, City of Glasgow GWD 1998 28-1445 where it was held that a statement of reasons does not have
-
. Mr Skinner referred to Doyle v City of Glasgow DC 1995 SLT 327 and Douglas v City of Glasgow DC
-
AW 399/12 Opinion of John A Baird, Esq., Advocate Sheriff of Glasgow and Strathkelvin at Glasgow In the case of Application on behalf of MH 28 February 2013 Background This is an application for the grant of Welfare Guardianship under the provisions of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 and for the grant of an Intervention Order under the provisions of section 53 of that Act, on behalf of an adult who was born with profound learning disabilities and is now 44 years
-
SHERIFF JAMES A TAYLOR AC700/00A JOHN McGREGOR DALGLISH v NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC Glasgow. 31 October 2000 NOTE:- At the options hearing the parties agreed that the pleadings required further adjustment in some respects. There was further agreement that the arguments foreshadowed in paragraphs one and two of the defenders' Rule 22 Note could and should be debated without further, of the Dalmellington Iron Company & Others v The Glasgow & South Western Railway Company 16 Rettie
-
SHERIFFDOM OF LOTHIAN AND BORDERS Linlithgow A639/03 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL IAIN MACPHAIL QC in the appeal in the cause PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE Pursuers and Appellants against JOHN GIBSON trading as JOHN GIBSON FINANCIAL SERVICES Defender and Respondent _________________________ Act: Higgins, Advocate; Macdonalds, Glasgow Alt: Hughes; The Anderson Partnership, Glasgow EDINBURGH, 22 September 2004. The Sheriff Principal, having resumed consideration of the cause
-
. GLASGOW, 15 March 2002. The Sheriff Principal having resumed consideration of the cause, sustains, at the Boulevard Hotel near Glasgow. Mr Struthers told Mr Lavery that he had acted as agent for both Mr