-
SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW F326/11 JUDGMENT of SHERIFF PRINCIPAL C A L SCOTT, QC in the cause KA Pursuer against KS Defender Glasgow, 10 April 2014. The sheriff principal, having resumed consideration of the appeal, Allows same; Deletes the sheriff's finding in fact and in law substituting therefor "That the reinstatement of contact with the pursuer is not in the best interests of J."; Recalls the sheriff's interlocutor dated 7 August 2013; Repels
-
SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW F1404/12 JUDGMENT of SHERIFF PRINCIPAL C A L SCOTT, QC in the cause Kelly Rodger or Findlay Pursuer against Alasdair Russell Findlay Defender Glasgow, 14 March 2014. The sheriff principal, having resumed consideration of the appeal, Allows same and that to the extent of recalling the sheriff's interlocutor dated 12 July 2013 insofar as it granted an order for a capital payment of £8,177.24; Substitutes therefor an order
-
SLT 1064 2. Bass Inns & Taverns Limited v Glasgow District Licensing Board 1995 SC 226 3, . In re Finlay [1985] 1 A.C. 318 7. Loosefoot Entertainment Limited v City of Glasgow District Licensing Board 1991 SLT 843 8. Mirza v City of Glasgow Licensing Board 1996 SLT 1029 9. Noble v City of Glasgow District Council 1992 SLT 1315 10. Rex v Port of London Authority ex parte Kynoch, SLT 307 and Bass Inns & Taverns Limited v Glasgow District Licensing Board 1995 SC 226. The former
-
Act: S Munro, of Livingstone Brown, Solicitor, Glasgow Alt: Mrs S Christie, South Lanarkshire, in Glasgow Housing Association v O'Donnell 2004 Hous.L.R.78. As far as the question of whether, commented on Sheriff Holligan's words in Glasgow Housing Association v Sharkey 2005 SLT (Sh Ct
-
and the Adult was admitted to Lambhill Court Nursing Home in Glasgow for assessment. The Adult remained, of the limited financial requirements of the Adult. The Minuter, on the other hand, lives in Glasgow, access to her own transport so was reliant on public transport to make the journey from Glasgow
-
AW310/12 Opinion of John A Baird, Esq., Advocate Sheriff of Glasgow and Strathkelvin at Glasgow In the case of Applications by the Guardian of P Family Background This case involves the circumstances of three sisters, who according to all of the information I have been given and understand, were devoted to each other and to each other's welfare and wellbeing throughout their lives, understand it, she returned to live back in Glasgow and acquired a house close to that of her remaining
-
SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW A91/10 JUDGMENT of SHERIFF PRINCIPAL C A L SCOTT, QC in the cause Gordon Collins Pursuer against Carol Anne Sweeney Defender Glasgow, 13 March 2014. The sheriff principal, having resumed consideration of the appeal, Refuses same and Adheres to the sheriff's interlocutor dated 21 February 2013; Finds the defender liable to the pursuer in the expenses of the appeal; Allows an account thereof to be given in and remits same, when
-
SHRIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN Judgement of Sheriff C. Scott In the case of Marley Waterproofing Ltd v J H Lightbody & Son Ltd - A507/04 GLASGOW, 9th December 2005. The sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, repels the defenders' third plea-in-law in the principal action and sustains the pursuers' first plea-in-law to the extent of answering the second question, referred to as "Lightbody") in relation to premises known as Unit 6, 382 Townmill Road, Glasgow
-
A3898/03 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL EDWARD F BOWEN QC in the cause ALEXANDER MALEY PURSUERS against SCOTTISH MINISTERS DEFENDER Act: Kelly, Solicitor, Taylor & Kelly, Coatbridge. Alt: Miss Poole, Advocate, instructed by The Solicitor to the Scottish Executive. GLASGOW, 31 March, Ltd v Corbett, 1963 70 Sh Ct Reps 23. Reference was also made to Higgins v Glasgow Corporation, the present cases did. There were now some 58 actions in Glasgow Sheriff Court of a similar nature
-
A3036/02 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL JAMES A TAYLOR in causa Aitken Electrics Limited Pursuers against Toys R Us Limited & Others Defenders _______________________________ For the pursuers: Hamilton. For the defenders: Thomson, Advocate. GLASGOW, March 2006. The Sheriff, the owners and occupiers of a building in Helen Street, Glasgow. The defenders owned the adjoining piece, description of the pursuers' building at Helen Street, Glasgow in May 1997. In particular he did not accept