-
: Conn, Anderson Fyfe, Solicitors. GLASGOW, 9 June 2004. The Sheriff Principal having resumed, , Glasgow". The subject matter of the action arises out of the grant of a commercial lease of business, and Strathclyde Regional Council v Sheriff Clerk, Glasgow, 1992 SLT (Sh Ct) 79. In the first, in Strathclyde Regional Council v Sheriff Clerk, Glasgow (supra). As I have set out, the Sheriff Principal
-
, Mr Drummond cited Hamid v. City of Glasgow Licensing Board 2001 SLT 193. That was a case in which, their discretion in an unreasonable manner. Mr Drummond also cited Art Wells (t/a Corals) v. Glasgow, by the Appellant, viz:- Hamid v. City of Glasgow Licensing Board 2001 SLT 193, Wordie Property Co Ltd v. Secretary of State for Scotland 1984 SLT 346 and Art Wells (t/a/ Corals) v. City of Glasgow District
-
before, in other cases under the Act (see e.g. the case of FB Glasgow Sheriff Court 13 May 2005
-
of Glasgow District Council v Secretary of State for Scotland 1998 SLT 283. [10] Counsel pointed out, could also be found in City of Glasgow District Council v Secretary of State for Scotland sup. cit, was made to City of Glasgow District Council v Secretary of State for Scotland sup. cit., Bendles, in City of Glasgow District Council v Secretary of State for Scotland sup.cit. that it is impossible
-
West Nile Street, Glasgow from the pursuers. The defender was the sole director of Simply Construct, of outstanding sums due by Simply Construct Limited. On 11 June 2010 the Sheriff at Glasgow Sheriff, for expenses as taxed. On or around 4 October 2010 the Sheriff at Glasgow Sheriff Court granted decree, they currently sought to introduce. I was referred to the well-known case of Thomson v Glasgow
-
Cadogan Street, Glasgow G2 6QN Defenders ------------------------------------ LIVINGSTON December 2009, was on quantum only. The pursuer was represented by Mr Alan Macdonald, HBJ Claim Solutions, Solicitors, Glasgow, and the defenders by Ms Amy Devlin, Messrs Harper Macleod LLP, Solicitors, Glasgow. [2] The only, . For example, it was said by Lord President Clyde in the 1922 case of Elliot v Glasgow Corporation 1922 SC 146
-
: McKenzie, Harper McLeod, Solicitors. GLASGOW, 29 August 2002. The Sheriff Principal having resumed, in Glasgow. Moreover, if the defender falls to be regarded as a "consumer" at the time of entering, of Glasgow Sheriff Court but prorogated its jurisdiction. The sheriff refused to grant decree holding, for services rendered at Glasgow Sheriff Court to a client who resided in the area of the Dumbarton
-
W978/99 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL EDWARD F BOWEN QC in the cause GRANT MURPHY PURSUERS against KELLY MADDEN DEFENDER Act: McKenzie, Advocate, instructed by James Gildea SSC Alt: Miss Kerr, Messrs HBM Sayers, Solicitors GLASGOW, 29 March 2000. The Sheriff Principal having resumed consideration of the cause refuses the appeal and adheres to the interlocutors complained, House, 1 Carlton Place, Glasgow as a diet of assessment. NOTE: On 19 October 1998 the defender
-
SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW PC15/05 INTERLOCUTOR in causa, WRIGLEY, 11 Balshagray Avenue, Jordanhill, Glasgow G11 7EG RESPONDENT Act: Crawford, Advocate Alt : Brabender, Advocate GLASGOW, 28 November 2005 The Sheriff, having heard Counsel, March 2006 within the Sheriff Court House, 1 Carlton Place, Glasgow as a diet thereof: having heard, who trades as Terry's Tattoo Studio from premises at 23 Chisholm Street, Glasgow. On 11 February
-
A7619/04 JUDGMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL JAMES A TAYLOR in the cause McKindless Bus Company APPELLANTS/PURSUERS against Peter Davidson RESPONDENT/DEFENDER GLASGOW, January 2007. The Sheriff Principal, having resumed consideration of the appeal, Refuses the appeal; Adheres to the interlocutor of the Sheriff; Finds the appellants liable to the respondent in the expenses, prejudice. In the Corporation of Glasgow type of case, where one only is sued, while connivance