SCTSPRINT3

Judgment Search

257 search results for aberdeen

  1. OF ADVOCATION by DAVID JOHN CALDER Appellant; against PROCURATOR FISCAL, Aberdeen Respondent: _______ Act: Bovey, Q.C., M. Hughes; George Mathers & Co., Aberdeen Alt: Miss, in the Sheriff Court in Aberdeen. On 10 June 2004 the sheriff, on the application of the respondent, . On 11 March 2004 the sheriff at Aberdeen, on the application of the present respondent, granted, 23(3) of the 1971 Act, to search the complainer's premises at 9 Belmont Gardens, Aberdeen
  2. : Richards, Q.C., Borthwick; George Mathers & Co., Aberdeen Second accused: Reilly, Latif; Gavin Bain & Co., Aberdeen Third accused: Moggach, Rao; Gray & Kellas, Aberdeen 17 May 2006 1. Introduction [1] The accused were tried in the High Court at Aberdeen on an indictment which included, of Scotland, 10 Greenwell Road, Aberdeen, you Lee Everton Higgins, David George Henry Scott and Adam Murphy, to a flat at 15 Boyd Orr Close, Aberdeen, where they found and detained the first and second accused. It
  3. in Aberdeen High Court to charges 1 and 3 on an indictment which contained eight charges against her. Charge 1 was that on 10 May 2002 at 24 Lang Stracht, Aberdeen and elsewhere she was concerned, proposed to deal, in these proceedings, with certain sums of money found at 24 Lang Stracht, Aberdeen
  4. , Aberdeen in the presence of the respondent and his girlfriend. Three sums of money totalling £760, guilty of being concerned in the supplying of diamorphine at 226 and 224 Balmagask Road, Aberdeen, for a substantial period of time. His background was unfortunate. He had been born in Aberdeen, but his parents had
  5. :- "(1) between 10 April 2005 and 10 March 2007, both dates inclusive, at 38 Broomhill Road, Aberdeen, , Aberdeen, you David Samuel Brown did distribute or show indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, , Aberdeen, occupied by the appellant. [4] On 13 March 2007 police officers attended at the address
  6. APPEAL COURT, HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY [2017] HCJAC 53 HCA/2016/000671/XC HCA/2016/000672/XC Lady Paton Lord Malcolm Lord Turnbull OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LADY PATON in BILLS OF ADVOCATION by HER MAJESTY’S ADVOCATE Complainer against (FIRST) JENNIFER CORDINER AND (SECOND) HOLLIE MCKENZIE Respondents Complainer: Edwards QC, AD; Crown Agent First Respondent: D McKenzie; Iain Jane and Co, Peterhead Second Respondent: M C Mackenzie; George Mathers & Co, Aberdeen
  7. 2009 SCCR 421 at para [13] and Bello v PF Aberdeen [2015] HCJAC 14). It is the applicant’s task
  8. to the recent decision of this court in Doig v Procurator Fiscal Aberdeen advised on 26 February 2014. It
  9. to 3 March 2009 nine persons, including the two appellants, entered the airfield at Aberdeen Airport, at the helicopter port were suspended. Aberdeen Airport is a busy airport used by domestic and international, at the premises occupied by Aberdeen Airport Ltd ... you ... did conduct yourselves in a disorderly manner, terminal building and refuse to leave when requested, cause Aberdeen Airport to close, preventing
  10. EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2013] CSIH 101 Lord Menzies Lady Clark of Calton Lord Wheatley P957/12 OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LORD MENZIES in the Reclaiming Motion by GRAHAM GORDON Reclaimer; for Judicial Review _______________ Act: Coll; George Mathers & Co, Aberdeen Alt: Moynihan QC; Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission 6 November 2013 [1] In this reclaiming motion the reclaimer seeks to overturn

Right-hand Menu