SCTSPRINT3

Judgment Search

44 search results for O'Donnell

  1. orders served on John O'Donnell, 15 Clarkston Road, Glasgow, Messrs. Maclay Murray & Spens, 151 St
  2. Portland Cement Manufacturers Limited [1964] 1 WLR 768; O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co. 1967 SC (HL
  3. to the case of O'Donnell v. Murdoch McKenzie & Company Limited 1966 S.C. 58, and in particular to what
  4. Upjohn and Wilberforce in O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co 1967 S.C. (H.L.) 63 (at 71 and 73
  5. on behalf of the defender, in light of the observations in O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co. Ltd 1967
  6. ) v O'Donnell 1958 SLT (Notes) 46 - see Brogan v William Allan Smith & Co Ltd 1965 SLT 175
  7. of general application, and indeed in O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co. Limited 1967 S.C. (H.L.) 63, questions of credibility or reliability; (b) that in O'Donnell their Lordships had borne to follow, favour. I am unable to read the speeches in O'Donnell as imposing any obligation on the court to draw
  8. O'Donnell (her own witness). The pursuer was never asked if he strengthened the bridge in 1987 when he, at their evidence. Janet O'Donnell was aged 36 so must have been born in about 1965. Her contact with the croft
  9. OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause ALLAN MACKENZIE NICOL Pursuer; against (FIRST) CALEDONIAN NEWSPAPERS LIMITED and (SECOND) ALLAN CALDWELL Defenders ________________ Pursuer: Bovey, Q.C.; Devlin; Lindsays S.S.C. (for O'Donnell Vaughan, Solicitors, Glasgow) Defenders: Jones Q.C.; Ellis; Balfour & Manson (for Bannantyne, Kirkwood, France & Co, Solicitors, Glasgow) 11 April 2002 Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports
  10. to the defender: see O'Donnell v McKenzie 1967 SC(HL) 63 at 71, 73, and Davidson v Duncan 1981 SC 83 I

Right-hand Menu