Judgment Search

44 search results for O'Donnell

1. HUGH McBAIN URQUHART+MRS. DEANNA URQUHART v. OWEN JAMES SWEENEY+LARKIN BRAE HORSE FARM LIMITED+ANDREW C. NORMAND+VASTLANDS PROPERTIES LIMITED - 18 March 2004
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=ef9f87a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   acting for the appellant. After April 2002 he was represented by the firm of O'Donnell Vaughan. [20, the sheriff that on 13 August 2002 he had learned that O'Donnell Vaughan had withdrawn from acting for him
2. ALAN PEARSON v. J. RAY MCDERMOTT DIVING INTERNATIONAL INC - 13 June 2008
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=bf9486a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   [1964] 1 WLR 768 and Lord Upjohn in O'Donnell v Murdoch M'Kenzie & Co. Ltd. 1967 SC (HL) 23, put on it by Lord Upjohn in O'Donnell v Murdoch M'Kenzie & Co. Ltd. 1967 SLT at p. 232
3. MHAIRI STAINSBY v. JANICE FALLON - 06 July 2010
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=303086a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   by child pedestrians. Reference was made to the following cases: O'Donnell v Lambert & Mackenzie, favourable to the pursuer: O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co 1967 SC (HL) 63. There was evidence
4. CASTLE INNS (STIRLING) LIMITED, t/a CASTLE LEISURE GROUP v. CLARK COTNRACTS LIMITED - 22 December 2009
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=d9b086a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   on 21 February 2002 (production 27, paragraph 3.3 .1), Mr O'Donnell, the individual principally, meeting no 2, held on 12 March (production 29, paragraph 20.1), Mr O'Donnell mentioned that site, no 5, held on 2 April, Dimension's site manager, Mr O'Donnell, stated that Dimension were
5. INTEGRI CONSULTANTS LIMITED AGAINST MIDLOTHIAN COUNCIL

    

   - 20 October 2021
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=f0e783ff-bc51-4c05-a2cd-36d22fc02fd5
   of disclosure in respect of pre contractual representation (Royal Bank of Scotland v O'Donnell 2015 SC
6. I.S.T. MARINE LTD v. KEVIN DILLON - 16 September 2005
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=25ea86a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   A505/04 JUDGEMENT OF SHERIFF PRINCIPAL BA KERR, QC in the cause I S T MARINE LTD Pursuers/Respondents Against KEVIN DILLON Defender/Appellant ________________ Act: Mr McClelland (Maclay Murray & Spens) Alt: Ms O'Donnell (Henderson Boyd Jackson) GREENOCK, 16 September 2005 The Sheriff Principal having resumed consideration of the cause Allows the appeal and Recalls the interlocutor of the sheriff dated 4 April 2005 save insofar as the record was thereby
7. DALE McFARLANE v. BARRY THAIN+JAMES CAMPBELL+THE MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU - 08 November 2007
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=c94786a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   ; and O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co, 1967 S.C. (H.L.) 63, at pages 71-2. The speed of the motorcycle [25, counsel for the second defender contended that any observations from Ross and O'Donnell cit. sup, Portland Cement Manufacturers and O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co., cit. sup., qualified to some
8. PATRICIA MARIAN MURRAY or McHUGH v. MARTIN CLAIR McHUGH - 15 December 2000
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=825487a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   . The defender's contact at Asda was one Jim O'Donnell. Through Jim O'Donnell, the defender
9. KENNETH WINN-POPE v. E.S. ACCESS PLATFORMS &c - 24 May 2012
   /search-judgments/judgment?id=e8938aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
   such inferences: Ross v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers 1964 1 WLR 768 and O'Donnell v Murdoch
10. J.P.M. or L. (AP) v. B.W.L. - 13 June 2003
    /search-judgments/judgment?id=343887a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
    inference most favourable to the pursuer - O'Donnell v Murdoch McKenzie & Co Limited 1967 SC(HL) 63, Lord