The objectives of the Scottish Court Service are supported by targets which relate to the speedy, efficient and effective disposal of court business and the standards of service provided to court users. A more detailed summary of performance, targets and supporting activity is covered in chapters 3 and 4. The key measures are reported on within this Chapter.
| Brief description | TARGETS, OUTTURNS & ACHIEVEMENTS | ||||
| 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | TARGETS FOR 2005-06 |
||
| Court of Session | |||||
| Average waiting periods in civil appeals other than early disposal | Target | 18 Term Weeks |
18 Term Weeks |
18 Term Weeks |
18 Term Weeks |
| Outturn | 27 Term Weeks |
30 Term Weeks |
27 Term Weeks |
||
| Average waiting period for ordinary proofs | Target | 19 Term Weeks |
19 Term Weeks |
19 Term Weeks |
19 Term Weeks |
| Outturn | 35 Term Weeks |
41 Term Weeks |
34 Term Weeks |
||
| High Court of Justiciary | |||||
| Average waiting period for solemn sentence appeals from date leave granted | Target | 5 Weeks |
5 Weeks |
9 Weeks |
9 Weeks |
| Outturn | 10 Weeks |
13 Weeks |
11 Weeks |
||
| Average waiting periods for solemn conviction and sentence appeals from date leave granted | Target | 10 Term Weeks |
10 Term Weeks |
17 Term Weeks |
17 Term Weeks |
| Outturn | 42 Term Weeks |
42 Term Weeks |
29 Term Weeks |
||
| Average waiting period for summary sentence appeals from date leave granted | Target | 5 Weeks |
5 Weeks |
9 Weeks |
9 Weeks |
| Outturn | 9 Weeks |
26 Weeks |
15 Weeks |
||
| Average waiting period for summary stated case appeals from date leave granted | Target | 6 Term Weeks |
6 Term Weeks |
6 Term Weeks |
6 Term Weeks |
| Outturn | 50 Term Weeks |
53 Term Weeks |
25 Term Weeks |
||
| Sheriff Court | |||||
| Percentage of summary criminal cases disposed of within 20 weeks | Target | 81% | 83% | 85% | 85% |
| Outturn | 80% | 84% | 84% | ||
| Average waiting period (weighted) for ordinary civil cases agreed with the Sheriffs Principal | Target | 12 Weeks |
12 Weeks |
12 Weeks |
12 Weeks |
| Outturn | 11 Weeks |
11 Weeks |
11 Weeks |
||
| Brief description | TARGETS, OUTTURNS & ACHIEVEMENTS | ||||
| 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | TARGETS FOR 2005-06 |
||
| Quality | |||||
| Percentage achievement of the administrative standards set by the Lord President and the Lord Justice General for the Court of Session and the High Court of Justiciary | Target | 95% | 96% | 97% | 97% |
| Outturn | 89% | 94% | 98% | ||
| Percentage achievement of the administrative standards agreed with the Sheriffs Principal in the Sheriff Courts | Target | 96% | 97% | 98% | 98% |
| Outturn | 97% | 96% | 96% | ||
| Percentage of Courthouses meeting the ‘Coming to Court’ standards | Target | 88% | 89% | 94% | 94% |
| Outturn | 88% | 94% | 94% | ||
| To meet the anticipated demand for sitting days | Target | 31,500 | 31,700 | 31,900 | 31,900 |
| Outturn | 32,593 | 33,177 | 33,068 | ||
| Customer satisfaction rating as measured by annual survey | Target | 75% | 80% | 75% | 75% |
| Outturn | 68% | 75% | 79%* | ||
* The methodology used to obtain the 2004-2005 Customer satisfaction rating as measured by annual survey has changed from that used in the previous 2 years therefore no comparison between the years can be drawn.
Procedural changes and additional judicial resources led to improvements in bringing down waiting periods in criminal appeals. This year, with civil waiting periods either holding steady or improving, marked reductions have been achieved across all main criminal appeal categories. The most substantial was in relation to summary stated case appeals with a reduction of more than 50% on 2003/04 outturn. This impetus will continue in the coming year.
Performance was at or close to target in relation to summary criminal case throughput and on criminal and civil waiting periods. A combination of pressures (staff shortages, vacancies and temporary absences, which affected numbers and level of experience) within 2 of the largest courts meant that 3 of the administrative targets were not met within 2 Sheriffdoms, this resulted in a lower overall average. Extra resources have now been allocated to these areas to ensure that the targets are met and improvements are now evident.
The methodology used to obtain the 2005 customer satisfaction rating as measured by annual survey has changed from that piloted in 2003 and revised in 2004. The main changes were the inclusion for the first time in 2005 of professional court users in the survey; administration of the survey by exit interview in all but three Sheriff Court locations; and use of self-completion questionnaires for jurors, administered by clerks. The survey questionnaire was also revised to take account of the needs of professional users and disabled users, and a question about satisfaction with the SCS website was added.