Modernising Justice in Scotland: The Reform of the High Court of Justiciary
Previous | Contents | Next
Chapter 2: CONSULTATION
- Lord Bonomy’s report, ‘Improving
Practice’ was published for consultation on 11 December
2002. The consultation period closed on 11 April 2003. We
undertook separate specific consultation with those who have
experience of the system, including victims, jurors and accused
on remand/ sentenced prisoners. We also used focus groups
to consult members of the public.
- The responses were varied but broadly supportive of Lord
Bonomy’s recommendations, in particular the principal
objective of bringing more order and a greater degree of
certainty to the conduct and proceedings of the High Court.
In what follows, we give an analysis of how we have arrived
at our decisions on the way forward, drawing on the views
of consultees.
- A summary of responses to consultation will be published
shortly. Some consultees asked that their response be kept
confidential. The non-confidential responses may be obtained
on request from the Scottish Government.
- There has been very full consultation on the proposals
made by Lord Bonomy. Although, therefore, comments on this
White Paper are welcome, we are not repeating that full scale
consultation again. We think Lord Bonomy has given us a solid,
credible package for reform and are therefore taking it forward
as a whole, albeit with some adjustments which the White
Paper spells out. Comments submitted as part of the earlier
consultation, where appropriate, have been taken account
of in the drafting of this White Paper.
THE APPROACH IN THIS PAPER
- The next section of this paper summarises our proposals
for implementing Lord Bonomy’s review. While this is
presented in terms of problems and solutions, the proposals
must be seen as a package in which the elements are integrally
linked and in which dropping any one aspect could substantially
weaken the impact of the package as a whole. It is even more
important to bear this in mind in the remainder of the paper
as we go through each main area setting out how our proposals
would address the issues identified, what our consultees
said, and how the proposals will be implemented, including
the resource implications. The subject matter of these latter
sections is technical but we aim to explain the relevant
law and practice in as simple terms as possible for the lay
reader.
- Finally, we list in an annex the extent to which we intend
to apply changes proposed for the High Court also to the
sheriff and jury courts.
Previous | Contents | Next